UPDATE: The Senate vote on SJR127 has been delayed until next Wednesday. In a major legislative setback for the GOP, the Senate adopted Sen. Douglas Henry's (D-Nashville) Amendment 3, which is an attempt to get some kind of protection for victims of rape and incest which the GOP has been fighting. The amended bill must have three readings before a vote. The second reading is scheduled for Monday and the third for Wednesday.
Original post follows...
The TN GOP says:
The constitutional amendment would not ban abortion in Tennessee – rather, it would permit the legislature to enact commonsense regulations such as informed consent, a waiting period, and parental notification in the case of a minor seeking an abortion.
"Democrat Sen. Joe Haynes of Nashville is leading the charge against the proposed constitutional amendment because he supports the extreme position of abortion-on-demand and public funding of the slaughter," said Bill Hobbs, communications director for the Tennessee Republican Party.
That's some pretty offensive rhetoric.
At any rate, the amendment, which is out of step with 70% of Tennesseans who think abortion should be legal, safe, and rare, opens the way for restrictions that the state Supreme Court has already said were unconstitutional.
It is also the first step toward an outright ban, as the TN GOP admits when they say the amendment would "leave future abortion policy questions up to the elected legislature rather than the courts if the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down the Roe v. Wade decision."
They have not made a rational case for why the state constitution should have specific language regarding medical procedures that are the private business of a woman, her physician, her family, and her clergy.
The TN GOP has also not explained why they oppose exceptions to their abortion ban in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of a pregnant woman. Which is curious, because the supporters of this bill have said before that they support exceptions to their abortion ban in these cases.
Further, they are now out of step with Tennessee's national Republican leadership, including Senators Alexander and Corker who have both said they believe such exceptions are necessary. Even former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said "I believe that abortion is an option that a woman should have" and that he would not vote to make abortion illegal.
Former Senator Fred Thompson also voted consistently for federal funding for abortions in such cases, but now that their man Fred Thompson has let them down it's open season for the TN GOP to attack his record.
The bottom line is that this is a pathetically transparent political stunt to get yet another wedge issue on the ballot for the 2010 gubernatorial election in an effort to get right-wing extremists out to the polls. Tennessee deserves better leadership than this.
The state Senate voted on Thursday to delay a vote on a constitutional amendment that could lead to an eventual statewide abortion ban, giving lawmakers more time to study exemptions for rape, incest or danger to the mother’s health.
The proposed amendment from Sen. Diane Black, a Gallatin Republican, specifies that nothing in the state constitution protects abortion rights.
The Senate voted 29-3 to change the proposal to ensure that the legislature could regulate abortion in the future, including allowing the procedure in cases of women who are victims of rape or incest, or whose health was in danger.
The constitutional amendment is widely seen as opening the door for an eventual statewide ban should the U.S. Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade. Opponents have accused the Republican leadership of using the issue as an election-year wedge issue.
On the Senate floor, Black denied that politics were behind the proposal.
“This matter is too important to play politics. Those who oppose it will try to muddy the waters and change the focus of what this amendment is about,” she said.
The future of the proposal far from clear. Before the issue could come to the ballot, it would require House approval this year, and lawmakers in both houses would have to pass it again in the next legislative session.
In the last session, the House allowed the proposal to die in committee without coming to a vote.
Hm. So, will Black capitulate to TN Right to Life forces trying to push this thing to the fore, in all its exemptionless glory? And take the hit from the moderate, moneyed Republicans who pushed her into office in 2004, and who will doubtless want to preserve the right to abortion in some circumstances for their daughters and sisters?
Will some righteous woman Democrats, who want to see this thing go down in flames, force Black into this confrontation? Stay tuned. I'll make the popcorn.
______________________________________
“Don't wait. The time will never be just right.” - Napoleon Hill
Link...
Hm. So, will Black capitulate to TN Right to Life forces trying to push this thing to the fore, in all its exemptionless glory? And take the hit from the moderate, moneyed Republicans who pushed her into office in 2004, and who will doubtless want to preserve the right to abortion in some circumstances for their daughters and sisters?
Will some righteous woman Democrats, who want to see this thing go down in flames, force Black into this confrontation? Stay tuned. I'll make the popcorn.
______________________________________
“Don't wait. The time will never be just right.” - Napoleon Hill